home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2085>
- <link 93TO0103>
- <title>
- Aug. 23, 1993: A Convict's View
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Aug. 23, 1993 America The Violent
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- COVER, Page 33
- A Convict's View: "People Don't Want Solutions"
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Richard Woodbury and Wilbert Rideau
- </p>
- <p> Wilbert Rideau, 51, has been imprisoned since 1962 at the Louisiana
- State Penitentiary at Angola, serving a life sentence for murder.
- During that time, Rideau has gained renown as a journalist,
- author and advocate of prison reform. In a conver sation with
- TIME Houston bureau chief Richard Woodbury, Rideau gave a scathing
- critique of the prison system:
- </p>
- <p> Q. What do you think of Clinton's crime package?
- </p>
- <p> A. Public fear is out of control, so he has to put more police
- on the streets. Boot camps can help, but often they're just
- another feel-good device for punishing criminals. I'd like to
- see more efforts aimed at really improving people. Crime is
- a social problem, and education is the only real deterrent.
- Look at all of us in prison: we were all truants and dropouts,
- a failure of the education system. Look at your truancy problem,
- and you're looking at your future prisoners. Put the money there.
- </p>
- <p> Q. How have the increases in violent crime over the years contributed
- to a tougher mood in the country?
- </p>
- <p> A. It's a self-fulfilling hypothesis. If you scare people enough
- and make them believe the world is crumbling around them, at
- some point they'll start reacting. The news media have helped
- set the tone of rabid crime, and the politicians just pick up
- the theme and go with the flow.
- </p>
- <p> Q. What has been the fallout on prisons of this get-tough mood?
- Is their basic role changing?
- </p>
- <p> A. Since the 1970s, they have increasingly become just giant
- warehouses where you pack convicts to suffer. Look around me
- in this place. It's a graveyard, a human wasteland of old men--most of them just sitting around waiting to die. Of the 5,200
- inmates here, 3,800 are lifers or serving sentences so long
- they will never get out. America has embraced vengeance as its
- criminal-justice philosophy. People don't want solutions to
- crime, they only want to feel good. That is what politicians
- are doing, they're making people feel secure. They offer them
- a platter of vindictiveness.
- </p>
- <p> Q. You don't feel that the tougher sentences are in any way
- a restraining influence on the criminal mind?
- </p>
- <p> A. Not at all. The length of a prison sentence has nothing to
- do with deterring crime. That theory is a crock. I mean, I've
- lived with criminals for 31 years. I know these guys, and myself.
- That's not the way it works. When the average guy commits a
- crime, he's either at the point where he doesn't care what happens
- to him, or more likely he feels he is going to get away with
- it. Punishment never factors into the equation. He just goes
- ahead because he feels he won't get caught.
- </p>
- <p> Q. Then what will stop violent crime?
- </p>
- <p> A. Only one thing: the certainty of apprehension. If a criminal
- fears that he's going to get caught, he will think twice before
- he robs or steals. And it won't matter whether the sentence
- is one year or 100 years.
- </p>
- <p> Q. What would have deterred you?
- </p>
- <p> A. I've thought a lot about that. I know that if I hadn't been
- able to walk into a pawnshop and buy a handgun as easily as
- I did, I wouldn't have robbed that bank. That applies to just
- about everybody in this prison who ever held up anybody. Nobody
- robs a place with a knife or a can of Mace. I was 19, an eighth-grade
- dropout. If I'd known that things weren't as helpless as I thought
- they were, that would have stopped me. I wouldn't have felt
- so frustrated.
- </p>
- <p> Q. How would you go about paying for education programs you
- propose, given the cash-starved nature of most government budgets?
- </p>
- <p> A. By shortening sentences. Sure, that's a hot button, but the
- public must come to realize that it can't enjoy its full measure
- of vengeance and expect at the same time to reduce bulging inmate
- populations. The citizenry must determine the minimum amount
- of punishment that it is willing to settle for, and then channel
- the millions it has saved into schools and preventive programs.
- </p>
- <p> Q. Given the level of public outrage, how would you deal with
- those who do commit serious crimes?
- </p>
- <p> A. You don't go handing out 99-year, no-parole sentences all
- over the place. That's ridiculous. States can't afford to keep
- locking people away for eternity. It takes $1 million to house
- a lifer. Look at these convicts around me. They're old men at
- 50, like me, or even 40. The fire's been burned out of them
- years ago. Most of them you'll never have to worry about again.
- </p>
- <p> Q. Isn't the notion of shorter sentences an incendiary idea
- in today's political climate?
- </p>
- <p> A. Probably. But the public has been sold a bill of goods on
- prisons, just like it's been given a distorted, negative picture
- of recidivism and parole. Most of the guys in this prison will
- never return to Angola, I can tell you that from being here.
- And parole can and does work, and I would expand it. I'd much
- rather pay for parole officers to supervise nondangerous people
- than build $100,000 cells.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-